you put it all on Randr's shoulders because of timing, one could also find amazing coincidence that this happens within what, 12 hours of you handing the reins over to someone else? I'd also state that although I support your product (there was a need and not everyone can build their own cab), there probably isn't a bigger target you can draw attention wise then commercializing part of the hobby.
That is BS and that's what Randr was trying to tell you I think, knock off the BS sitting high On your horse because THAT is when you become a target, not necessarily from those you think. But You've stated time and time again when attacking other people that you were the only one licensed blah blah blah, but as we can see here, you were not always licensed. I know the copyright owners have a very different opinion on this and that's ok. I think as a community we all share various opinions on this. This has been part of our hobby and the mame hobby. I have no problem if you or other sites were hosting roms illegally.
Pinbox pinball roms license#
I mean can you imagine if Disney licenses their product to a toy line company for a 5 year contract and the company goes bankrupt after 1 year that they are then stuck for the next 4 years unable to license to someone else? I also hope that when nanotech allowed you to host the roms that you check if their own license allowed them to sub license because that's not automatic and not something to assume! I'm not a lawyer, someone who is would have to chime in but some google searches seem to indicate legally, you were not authorized once the company went bye bye, that agreement was now null and void and at the very least whenever John Jukes licensed the Gottlieb assets. That version of nanotech stopped operating, what, 8-9 years go? So it's possible and probable the agreement died when the company died. I'm done putting up with the bullshit accusations thrown at me, and I'm more than happy to expose the truth. Either by or through, that's precisely what happened. Par for the course I guess.Īccusation my ass. That's ok, I'm sure many are now disappointed in me too. But still sooo disappointed in a lot of people here. This is a great community and these forums are fantastic. At any rate, you crossed a line here and I won't forget it. I'm hoping it's because members simply didn't read your accusation that Randr caused the DMCA takedown. Frankly I'm more disappointed in the lack of reaction from members. I'm disappointed in what you posted but it's par for the course lately so not unexpected. Noah: Why don't you make a new deal then? A DMCA takedown doesn't mean you are never able to make a new deal if an old one expired, yet by saying what you posted, its like "too late now".
0 kommentar(er)
